In the early days of my career, I joined a workforce management team that was absolutely fixated on operational metrics. We had beautifully designed dashboards, daily “scorecards,” and meticulous trend lines for everything from employee occupancy rates to how many minutes each person spent in an offline state. We tracked schedule adherence down to the second, obsessively monitored attendance figures, and dissected data on every billable minute. It felt like every moment of employee activity could be logged, analyzed, and optimized — and every meeting brought a fresh flurry of charts and graphs to prove it.

Yet for all that, our performance wasn’t improving as much as we’d hoped. The metrics told one story, but the reality out on the floor told another. Agents were finding clever ways to appear maximally “productive” on paper—taking just-in-time breaks to meet adherence targets, rushing tasks to close out handle times—but these tactics didn’t necessarily translate into better service or healthier morale. In fact, the team was dogged by stress and burnout; people felt more like cogs to be measured than professionals tasked with solving real problems. There was a palpable disconnect between the numbers on the screen and the day-to-day realities our employees were facing.

It felt a bit like we were navigating the Sahara Desert with a gold-plated speedometer but no compass. We knew exactly how fast we were traveling, down to the decimal, but no one seemed to notice (or mention) we might be heading in the wrong direction. Months later, the mismatch between our glowing “key metrics” and our actual outcomes became too large to ignore.

That’s the danger of fetishizing measurements: the lure of tidy statistics often overshadows the deeper need to ask, Are we going the right way? Are these metrics truly helping us create value, or are we just hypnotized by the next incremental uptick?

Recommended Listening:

The Allure of Metrics

For better or worse, we live in the golden age of data. Technological advances make it possible to capture virtually every action, time stamp it, and feed it into a sleek analytics platform. The brilliance of metrics is their power to condense complexity into simpler benchmarks. A well-chosen metric can highlight what matters in a sea of possibilities. It makes intangible concepts tangible — or at least it appears to.

But that simplicity is also seductive. The corporate world runs on goals, benchmarks, and comparisons. We’re always looking for ways to measure our performance, and once a metric is set, we pour our energy into improving that number. We see those figures climb — the chart line rising like a roller coaster car cranking skyward — and we get a rush of excitement.

This visceral excitement can, however, devolve into a dangerous mindset: If the metric is good, everything is good. In the worst cases, entire teams start “gaming” the metric because getting the numbers up becomes more important than actually achieving the underlying objective. Everyone becomes laser-focused on the chart’s next upward tick, forgetting to step back and ask, Does this reflect real progress, or is this just an artificial boost for the sake of appearances?

The Hierarchy of Measurement

One of the biggest pitfalls I’ve witnessed is the confusion between strategic and tactical metrics. Both categories serve critical, but distinctly different, purposes:

1. Strategic MetricsThese are the high-level indicators that senior executives or top-level stakeholders rely on — think EBITDA growth, market share, Net Promoter Score (NPS), gross revenue, or major milestone achievements. Their strength lies in providing a broad perspective. A CEO or CFO can look at these numbers and make big-picture decisions on resource allocation, investments, or market expansions.
   • However, these metrics are usually too broad for daily operations. If you’re a front-line manager running a support desk, it’s not always obvious how your daily interactions with customers directly tie into the company’s overall EBITDA. Without a clear link, your team can’t easily adjust day-to-day behaviors to influence such a high-level figure.
2. Tactical MetricsThese are the ground-level measurements: ticket-close rates, average order times, conversion rates on specific campaigns, or the number of positive vs. negative social media mentions in a given day. These figures help individual teams identify immediate issues (like a spike in support tickets about a specific bug) and drive swift corrective action.
   • However, taken in isolation, tactical metrics can cause tunnel vision. A support team might fixate on speeding up ticket closures, losing sight of long-term customer satisfaction. A marketing group might chase raw leads, losing sight of the bigger revenue or brand-building picture.

A common mistake is trying to collapse these two levels into one. An executive sees the big-picture metric dipping, so they push front-line teams with that same metric. The frontline teams, lacking immediate levers to meaningfully affect this high-level number, get frustrated or start bending their day-to-day processes in unnatural ways to try and move the needle. Meanwhile, if the front-line metrics are rolled up into an executive-level dashboard without proper context, top leaders might drown in minute details.

The key is to understand that while both strategic and tactical metrics are essential, their utility lies in their alignment to the right audience, the right timeframe, and the right decisions. That’s how we translate the numbers into useful insights, rather than letting them devolve into random stats no one understands or can act upon.

When Metrics Mislead

There’s a classic cautionary tale about a support center that prized “tickets closed” as its main performance metric. Unsurprisingly, agents raced to close as many tickets as possible — they would pick the easiest ones first and sometimes even close complicated ones prematurely, hoping to post a high volume by day’s end. Customer satisfaction plummeted, but the support center could claim they were “exceeding targets.”

This phenomenon appears across countless industries:

• Vanity Metrics – If you’ve ever seen a social media manager brag about thousands of new followers or the marketing team celebrating high “impression counts,” you’ve encountered vanity metrics. These may look good in a report, but they’re not always connected to actual revenue, user engagement, or customer loyalty.
• Mismatched KPIs – Similar to the support center story, many teams measure something that only tangentially captures what they’re supposed to achieve. If a social media goal is “shares” without linking it to brand relevance, or if a sales team focuses on “leads” without a framework for lead quality, you’re likely to see a short-term spike but no real benefit down the line.
• Death by Dashboard – Overloading a single dashboard with dozens of metrics can paralyze decision-makers. Everything looks important, but without a hierarchy of significance, you can’t tell which data points are crucial and which are merely “interesting.” People scramble to address every tiny dip, and the organization starts playing whack-a-mole with random fluctuations.

In a real-world sense, misleading metrics waste resources and, worse, can guide an entire company off track. Imagine doubling down on user sign-up numbers for your mobile app while ignoring that only 5% of new users ever come back a second time. The sign-up figure might skyrocket, but you’ve essentially built a bucket with a massive leak at the bottom.

Good Metrics Have Context

To avoid the lure of hollow measurements, always begin with a crucial question: What are we trying to learn? Are we attempting to diagnose a bottleneck in our delivery chain? Assess the effectiveness of a new marketing campaign aimed at brand awareness? Understand if our product pivot is gaining traction among our target demographic?

A good metric:

1. Directly Ties to a Business Goal – If your overarching priority is to improve customer satisfaction, find a way to measure actual satisfaction, not just how many calls were answered. The metric itself should shine a light on whether you’re advancing the broader objective.
2. Reflects a Process You Can Influence – If you can’t directly impact the measurement through realistic actions, it’s frustrating and futile to monitor it. For instance, local teams have limited control over global currency fluctuations — so using daily exchange rates as a performance metric for store managers is pointless.
3. Is Understood by the People Using It – Even the most insightful data is useless if no one understands what it means. Make sure the definitions and implications are crystal clear. If a metric is “customer effort score,” ensure that the entire team understands how that score is calculated, how it’s trending, and why it matters.
4. Comes with a Narrative or Story – Data alone can be cold. Pair your numbers with qualitative insights or anecdotes that bring them to life. For instance, highlight specific customer feedback alongside a satisfaction rating. This approach fosters deeper empathy and a more nuanced understanding.

Principles for Useful Metrics

Given all these considerations, here are some guiding principles to keep your metrics grounded, beneficial, and aligned with reality:

1. Purpose First

Before choosing what to measure, articulate why you’re measuring it. If your goal is to diagnose performance in a certain area, you’ll want a metric that clearly signals the presence (or absence) of progress. For example, if your purpose is to reduce product returns, track not only the rate of returns but also the common reasons why customers send items back. Numbers that directly lead you to the root cause of an issue will inform smarter actions than a single top-line statistic.

2. Right Layer, Right Metric

Recognize the difference between strategic and tactical layers. If you’re an executive, you need high-level macro indicators such as revenue growth, market penetration, or brand sentiment. But if you’re a front-line manager, you need actionable data, like daily throughput or average resolution times. It’s perfectly acceptable — and often beneficial — to have different dashboards for different levels of the organization. Just ensure they’re all coherent, so no one is working at cross-purposes.

3. Less Is More

Focus on a small set of meaningful metrics instead of an ocean of data points that no one can remember. Often, three to five truly insightful measures can guide a team more effectively than 20 metrics only half-understood. As you sharpen your focus on a few core indicators, you create alignment across the organization and make it easier for everyone to see how they contribute.

4. Explain the Why

Data is most powerful when it’s paired with context and narrative. Don’t just throw numbers onto a slide deck. Give them meaning by explaining why you chose these metrics, how they connect to the broader strategy, and what kinds of decisions or actions they should inform. When people understand the rationale behind a metric, they’re more motivated to engage with it in a genuine, problem-solving spirit rather than trying to “game” or superficially boost it.

Reflection

Returning to my early experience with that data-obsessed WFM team, I can now see clearly where we went wrong. We had so many dashboards that we nearly forgot to ask: Where do we truly want to go? Instead of focusing on a handful of compelling, directly relevant metrics, we buried ourselves in numeric minutiae. The conversation devolved from How can we better serve our customers and ensure business needs are met? to How can we get people to understand how this report works? The result was a monumental amount of effort expended for surprisingly meager returns.

Here’s the philosophical core of this discussion: Metrics should serve our goals, not replace them. They should light the way forward, helping us make sense of complex business realities, rather than becoming an end in themselves. When you find yourself celebrating a number without asking how it ties back to actual outcomes or real improvements, pause and reflect. Are you measuring what truly matters, or just what’s easy to count?

In any business setting, whether you’re a senior executive plotting strategic moves or a frontline manager optimizing daily performance, the right metrics can elevate your decision-making and clarify your path. But misuse them, and they become distractions that can send an entire organization off course. Like the traveler speeding across the desert with a fancy speedometer, it’s better to journey with a solid compass — or at least a map — so that you know why you’re traveling, where you’re heading, and how you’ll know when you’ve arrived.

Ultimately, as you evaluate or design your own suite of metrics, remember to keep them aligned with genuine business processes and real-world goals. Don’t drown in an ocean of numbers — follow the signal, not the noise. Metrics should be the map, not the destination.